Love Wins: A Book About Heaven, Hell, and the Fate of Every Person Who Ever Lived by Rob Bell
The Open Volume
Thoughtful Reviews in Theology and Ministry
Love Wins: A Book About Heaven, Hell, and the Fate of Every Person Who Ever Lived
Rob Bell
Bibliographic Information
Author: Bell, Rob Full Title: Love Wins: A Book About Heaven, Hell, and the Fate of Every Person Who Ever Lived Publisher: HarperOne Year of Publication: 2011 Pages: 202 pp. ISBN: 978-0-06-204-964-3 Series (if applicable): N/A
Author Background
Rob Bell was, at the time of publication, founding pastor of Mars Hill Bible Church in Grand Rapids, Michigan, a megachurch he had led since 1999. He is best known for the widely distributed NOOMA video series and several previous books including Velvet Elvis (2005) and Sex God (2007). Bell's background is within the broadly evangelical tradition — he holds an M.Div. from Fuller Theological Seminary and was ordained in the Christian Reformed Church — but his work represents a post-evangelical or progressive evangelical trajectory that questions traditional doctrinal formulations while maintaining a commitment to the centrality of Jesus. His pastoral context at Mars Hill, which emphasized creative cultural engagement and theological inquiry, shaped his writing style: accessible, conversational, rhetorically provocative, and oriented toward questions rather than systematic argumentation. Bell's lack of formal academic affiliation or peer-reviewed scholarly publication should be noted — he writes as a pastor and public intellectual rather than as an academic theologian. This background bears directly on Love Wins: the book reflects pastoral concerns about the coherence and attractiveness of traditional evangelical teaching on hell, but it lacks the exegetical rigor and engagement with the theological tradition that academic readers will expect. Following the publication of Love Wins, Bell left Mars Hill Bible Church and has since pursued a career as a speaker and writer outside institutional church contexts.
Thesis and Central Argument
Bell's governing thesis is that the traditional evangelical doctrine of eternal conscious torment in hell is incompatible with the biblical portrayal of God's love, and that a more faithful reading of Scripture opens the possibility that God's redemptive love will ultimately triumph over all rebellion and restore all people to relationship with him. The book responds to a specific pastoral and theological problem: Bell observes that many people — both within and outside the church — find the traditional teaching that God eternally punishes the majority of humanity for temporal sins morally repugnant and inconsistent with the gospel's proclamation of divine love. His proposed contribution is threefold: exegetical (arguing that Scripture allows for a more hopeful eschatology than traditional evangelicalism has recognized), theological (insisting that God's love must be understood as genuinely universal in scope and ultimately victorious), and pastoral (providing believers with a framework for faith that does not require accepting what Bell sees as the moral incoherence of eternal conscious torment). The argument develops through a series of provocative questions and rereadings of key biblical texts, culminating in the claim that the phrase "love wins" captures the essential Christian hope better than traditional accounts of final judgment.
Overview of Contents
Love Wins is structured as eight chapters that build toward the central thesis cumulatively rather than systematically. The following overview traces the logic as it unfolds, noting where the argument depends on assumptions examined in the evaluation section.
Chapter 1 — "What About the Flat Tire?"
Bell opens with a series of questions about the exclusivity of salvation and the fate of those who have never heard the gospel. The chapter is structured as a sustained interrogation: What about the person who dies on the way to respond to a missionary's invitation? What about those born in non-Christian cultures? What about Gandhi? The rhetorical strategy is to create cognitive dissonance — to make the reader uncomfortable with answers that consign sincere seekers to eternal torment for accidents of birth or timing. Bell raises the question of God's character: would a loving God create billions of people knowing most would suffer eternally? The chapter establishes the book's tone: conversational, question-driven, and deliberately unsettling. Critics have noted that Bell presents traditional evangelical positions in their least defensible forms without engaging more sophisticated articulations, a pattern that continues throughout.
Chapter 2 — "Here Is the New There"
This chapter argues that the biblical vision of salvation is fundamentally about the restoration of creation rather than escape from it. Bell emphasizes that heaven is not a disembodied spiritual realm but the renewal of earth — citing passages like Revelation 21–22 that describe the New Jerusalem descending to earth. The chapter connects salvation to embodied, communal flourishing rather than to individual souls going to heaven when they die. This is one of the book's strongest exegetical sections — the emphasis on new creation resonates with N.T. Wright's work on eschatology and corrects the over-spiritualized accounts of the afterlife common in popular evangelicalism. However, Bell uses this emphasis on material renewal to minimize the urgency of evangelism and the reality of final judgment — a move that critics have identified as non-sequitur.
Chapter 3 — "Hell"
Bell surveys the biblical terminology for hell — Gehenna, Hades, and Sheol — arguing that these terms are more complex and less univocal than traditional evangelical teaching suggests. He notes that Gehenna refers to a literal valley outside Jerusalem where garbage burned, that Jesus's references to judgment often concern historical events (the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD), and that much biblical imagery for judgment is temporal rather than eternal. This chapter represents Bell's most sustained exegetical argument, but it demonstrates significant weaknesses. Bell correctly identifies the multiplicity of terms and their varied uses, but he does not engage the texts that most clearly teach eternal conscious punishment (Matthew 25:46, 2 Thessalonians 1:9, Revelation 20:10-15) with the care they require. He treats rhetorical questions as arguments and moves too quickly from "these images are more complex than we thought" to "therefore eternal conscious torment is not biblical."
Chapter 4 — "Does God Get What God Wants?"
This is the book's theological center. Bell argues that if God genuinely desires all people to be saved (1 Timothy 2:4, 2 Peter 3:9) and if God is genuinely sovereign, then God will accomplish that desire. The chapter poses a trilemma: either God is not loving (he doesn't want all saved), not powerful (he can't save all), or not successful (he wants to save all but fails). Bell insists that the traditional evangelical position makes God a failure — the vast majority of people are lost despite God's desire to save them — and argues that a proper doctrine of God requires affirming that love ultimately wins. This is the book's most theologically provocative claim, and it has generated the most sustained critical response. Reformed critics have noted that Bell's trilemma ignores the distinction between God's revealed will (he desires all to be saved) and his sovereign will (he ordains whatsoever comes to pass), and that the argument depends on collapsing that distinction without acknowledging the long theological tradition that maintains it.
Chapter 5 — "Dying to Live"
Bell argues that salvation is not primarily about the afterlife but about learning to live in the reality of God's love now. He emphasizes that the gospel invitation is to participate in God's restorative work in the present, and that heaven and hell are realities people experience in this life based on their response to God's love. The chapter draws heavily on Jesus's parables — particularly the prodigal son, which Bell reads as depicting the older brother choosing hell (resentment, self-righteousness) while remaining in the father's house. This chapter demonstrates Bell's pastoral instincts at their strongest — the emphasis on present transformation and on heaven and hell as spiritual realities beginning now is biblically grounded and pastorally helpful. However, Bell uses this emphasis to minimize the eschatological reality of final judgment, treating future judgment as essentially continuous with present spiritual states rather than as a decisive divine act.
Chapter 6 — "There Are Rocks Everywhere"
Bell argues that God's truth and love can be found outside explicitly Christian contexts, citing biblical examples of God working through non-Israelites (Melchizedek, Jethro) and Paul's speech in Athens (Acts 17). The chapter presents Christ as the logos — the divine word present in all creation — and suggests that people can encounter Christ without explicitly Christian language or categories. This is the book's most explicitly inclusivist chapter, and it raises questions about the necessity of conscious faith in Jesus for salvation. Bell's reading of Acts 17 is strained — he emphasizes Paul's affirmation that God is not far from each person without giving proportional attention to Paul's call for repentance — and critics have noted that the chapter does not engage the New Testament texts that most clearly teach the exclusivity of salvation through conscious faith in Christ (John 14:6, Acts 4:12, 1 Timothy 2:5).
Chapter 7 — "The Good News Is Better Than That"
This chapter critiques the traditional evangelical gospel presentation, particularly the emphasis on penal substitutionary atonement and the threat of hell as motivation for conversion. Bell argues that reducing the gospel to "accepting Jesus so you don't go to hell" distorts the biblical message and makes God appear vindictive. He presents multiple biblical metaphors for atonement — victory over evil powers, moral transformation, reconciliation — and argues that the evangelical tradition has overemphasized penal substitution at the expense of these richer images. The chapter is rhetorically powerful and raises legitimate questions about reductionistic gospel presentations, but Bell's treatment of penal substitution is superficial. He presents it in its crudest form (cosmic child abuse) without engaging the sophisticated Reformed articulations offered by theologians from Anselm to John Stott, and he does not acknowledge that the multiple atonement metaphors he favors are not alternatives to penal substitution but complementary perspectives that presuppose it.
Chapter 8 — "The End Is Here"
The book's final chapter returns to the theme of present participation in God's restorative work. Bell argues that the question is not "who goes to heaven when they die?" but "how is God restoring all things through Jesus, and how do we participate in that work now?" He emphasizes human agency — people are free to choose heaven (love, generosity, reconciliation) or hell (selfishness, resentment, isolation) in the present — and suggests that this freedom continues beyond death. Bell stops short of explicitly affirming universalism but strongly implies that postmortem opportunities for repentance remain open and that God's love will eventually overcome all resistance. The chapter concludes with the affirmation that love wins, by which Bell means both that God's love will ultimately triumph and that Christians should lead with love rather than threat in presenting the gospel.
Theological Evaluation and Critique
Exegetical and Hermeneutical Method
Bell's exegetical method is the book's most significant weakness. While he demonstrates familiarity with biblical texts and occasionally offers fresh readings, his handling of Scripture is consistently selective, rhetorical, and insufficiently engaged with the grain of the text. The treatment of Gehenna imagery in Chapter 3 illustrates the pattern: Bell correctly notes that Gehenna refers to a literal valley and that Jesus often uses the image in contexts of historical judgment, but he does not engage the contexts where the imagery clearly extends beyond temporal judgment to eschatological reality (Matthew 25:41-46, where the same adjective aiōnios describes both eternal life and eternal punishment). The book's hermeneutical framework — insofar as it can be identified — privileges questions over answers, destabilization over careful argument, and readers' moral intuitions over the hard edges of biblical texts that describe final judgment. Bell never states his hermeneutical commitments explicitly, but they operate throughout as unexamined assumptions: that difficult texts should be read in light of our sense of God's love rather than allowing difficult texts to challenge and reshape our sense of God's love; that rhetorical questions can substitute for exegetical argument; that if a doctrine strikes us as morally problematic, we should assume we have misread the texts that seem to teach it.
The book's most serious exegetical failure is its treatment of Matthew 25:46 — "And these will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life." Bell mentions the passage but does not engage the lexical reality that the same Greek adjective (aiōnios) modifies both punishment and life, which makes it exegetically untenable to argue that the punishment is temporary while the life is eternal. Reformed, Catholic, and Orthodox commentators across two millennia have recognized this text as decisive for the doctrine of eternal conscious punishment, and Bell's failure to address it substantively is a major gap. His treatment of 1 Timothy 2:4 ("God desires all people to be saved") and 2 Peter 3:9 ("not wishing that any should perish") similarly fails to engage the theological tradition's careful distinctions between God's revealed will (what he commands and desires) and God's sovereign will (what he decrees and accomplishes). These texts have been central to debates between Calvinists and Arminians for centuries, and both traditions have developed sophisticated readings that Bell does not acknowledge.
Doctrinal Analysis
Measured against the Apostles' Creed and the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed (381), Love Wins affirms the core of Christian orthodoxy — the incarnation, the resurrection, the second coming — but significantly qualifies the affirmation "he will come again to judge the living and the dead." Bell's account of final judgment makes it essentially continuous with present spiritual realities rather than a decisive eschatological event, which represents a departure from the ecumenical consensus. The Athanasian Creed's affirmation that "they that have done good shall go into life everlasting, and they that have done evil into everlasting fire" stands in direct tension with Bell's proposal.
From a Reformed perspective, the Westminster Confession of Faith (1646) teaches that "the souls of the wicked are cast into hell, where they remain in torments and utter darkness, reserved to the judgment of the great day" (XXXII.1) and that at the final judgment, "the wicked, who know not God, and obey not the gospel of Jesus Christ, shall be cast into eternal torments" (XXXIII.2). Bell's position is incompatible with these affirmations, and the Reformed response has been among the strongest. John Piper's "Farewell Rob Bell" tweet — posted before the book's release — signaled the Reformed community's assessment that Bell had departed from evangelical orthodoxy. Kevin DeYoung's review essay "God Is Still Holy and What You Learned in Sunday School Is Still True" engaged the book's exegetical and theological claims in detail and found them wanting at nearly every point. The Reformed objection is not merely that Bell questions eternal conscious torment but that he does so without engaging the biblical texts and theological arguments that have historically grounded that doctrine.
From a Wesleyan-Arminian perspective, the doctrinal stakes are somewhat different. The Methodist Articles of Religion (1784) affirm that Christ "shall come again, with glory, to judge both the quick and the dead" (Article III) but do not specify the nature or duration of final punishment with the precision the Westminster Confession employs. Wesleyan theology has historically affirmed eternal punishment but has also emphasized God's universal love and the real possibility of salvation for all people who respond to prevenient grace. Bell's emphasis on divine love resonates with Wesleyan instincts, but his failure to maintain the tension between love and justice that Wesley himself maintained represents a departure from the tradition. Roger Olson, a prominent Arminian theologian, has critiqued Bell for embracing inclusivism or universalism without adequately addressing the biblical texts on judgment.
From a Roman Catholic perspective, the Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches that "the teaching of the Church affirms the existence of hell and its eternity. Immediately after death the souls of those who die in a state of mortal sin descend into hell, where they suffer the punishments of hell, 'eternal fire'" (CCC 1035). The Catholic tradition, while affirming the reality of hell, has also maintained greater openness to postmortem purification (purgatory) and has emphasized that the church does not presume to know who, if anyone, is finally damned. Bell's position is closer to Catholic theological speculation about universal salvation — Hans Urs von Balthasar's Dare We Hope "That All Men Be Saved"? (1988) — than to Catholic dogma, but his lack of engagement with purgatorial doctrine and his failure to maintain the church's careful agnosticism about who is saved means that even the most optimistic Catholic readings would find his argument insufficiently grounded.
From an Eastern Orthodox perspective, Bell's emphasis on the priority of love and his suggestion that hell is self-chosen isolation from God rather than externally imposed torment resonates with Orthodox accounts of hell as the experience of God's love by those who have rejected it. Many Orthodox theologians have argued that God's love is the same fire that purifies the saved and tortures the damned, and this account appears sympathetically in Love Wins. However, Orthodox theology has historically affirmed the reality and eternity of hell while maintaining that its precise nature is apophatic — beyond our full comprehension. Bell's confident assertion that love will ultimately win everyone over goes beyond what the Orthodox tradition has been willing to affirm. Metropolitan Kallistos Ware's statement that "I am a convinced universalist who believes in hell" captures the Orthodox tension that Bell does not maintain.
Engagement with Secondary Literature
Love Wins engages virtually no scholarly secondary literature. The book has no footnotes, a minimal bibliography, and no sustained interaction with the theological tradition on final judgment, atonement, or soteriology. Bell does not engage the church fathers on hell — not Augustine's detailed treatment in The City of God, not Gregory of Nyssa's speculative universalism, not John Chrysostom's graphic descriptions of eternal torment. He does not engage the Reformers — not Calvin's careful exegesis of the judgment texts in the Institutes, not Luther's insistence on the hiddenness of God's final purposes. He does not engage modern theology — not Karl Barth's universalist-leaning account of election, not C.S. Lewis's The Great Divorce and The Problem of Pain, not Jürgen Moltmann's work on eschatology. The absence of N.T. Wright is particularly striking given how much Bell's emphasis on new creation depends on Wright's work — Wright is not cited, though his influence is evident. The absence of serious engagement with contrary positions is equally glaring: Bell does not interact with contemporary defenses of eternal conscious torment such as Robert Peterson's Hell on Trial (1995), Christopher Morgan and Robert Peterson's edited volume Hell Under Fire (2004), or the extensive systematic treatments in Louis Berkhof's Systematic Theology and Wayne Grudem's Systematic Theology.
The most significant dialogue partner Bell does engage is the popular evangelical culture he is critiquing — the reductionistic gospel presentations, the hell-focused evangelistic appeals, the "turn or burn" rhetoric. This engagement is substantive and often fair, but it cannot substitute for engagement with the best theological articulations of the positions he is challenging. The result is that Love Wins reads more like a prophet speaking to his own congregation than a theologian contributing to a scholarly conversation. This is appropriate for a popular-level book, but it means that readers seeking a rigorous treatment of these questions must turn elsewhere.
Strengths
The pastoral critique of reductionistic evangelism. Bell's strongest contribution is his identification of genuine problems in contemporary evangelical practice: the reduction of the gospel to "fire insurance," the weaponization of hell in evangelistic appeals, the presentation of God as primarily angry rather than loving, and the failure to connect salvation to present transformation and participation in God's restorative work. Chapter 7's critique of the "turn or burn" gospel is pastorally astute and biblically grounded. Bell is right that much popular evangelical preaching has reduced the rich biblical account of atonement to a single transactional metaphor, and his call to recover the full range of biblical images — Christus Victor, moral transformation, cosmic reconciliation — is valuable. For pastors who have seen people wounded by harsh, reductionistic presentations of the gospel, Love Wins articulates a legitimate concern and models a more winsome, love-centered approach to evangelism.
The emphasis on new creation. Chapter 2's insistence that the biblical vision of salvation is about the restoration of creation rather than escape from it represents a genuinely helpful corrective to the over-spiritualized eschatology common in popular evangelicalism. Bell's emphasis that heaven comes to earth, that resurrection is bodily, and that salvation involves the renewal of all things resonates with the best contemporary biblical scholarship (N.T. Wright, Richard Bauckham, J. Richard Middleton) and corrects the gnostic-leaning tendencies of much evangelical piety. This emphasis strengthens Christian engagement with social justice, environmental stewardship, and cultural renewal by grounding those concerns in the biblical hope for cosmic restoration.
The accessible, conversational style. Bell writes with unusual clarity and warmth for a book on such difficult topics. The short chapters, the rhetorical questions, the vivid contemporary illustrations, and the avoidance of theological jargon make the book accessible to readers who would find academic theology intimidating. For a popular-level work designed to reach people struggling with these questions, the style is a genuine strength. Bell succeeds in creating space for questions and doubts that many Christians have felt but have been afraid to voice in evangelical contexts.
Weaknesses and Limitations
The exegetical method is consistently selective and rhetorically manipulative. Bell's handling of Scripture creates the illusion of careful biblical engagement while systematically avoiding the texts that most clearly contradict his thesis. The treatment of Matthew 25:46 — mentioned but not engaged — is emblematic. When a book arguing against eternal punishment does not offer a substantive reading of the single verse that most clearly teaches it, using the same adjective for both eternal life and eternal punishment, the omission is not an oversight but a methodological failure. Similarly, Bell's treatment of Romans 9–11, which contains Paul's most extensive discussion of election and the scope of salvation, is superficial. He quotes Romans 11:32 ("God has consigned all to disobedience, that he may have mercy on all") without engaging Romans 9:22-23 on vessels of wrath prepared for destruction. The selective quotation, the rhetorical questions that substitute for argument, and the failure to let difficult texts actually be difficult undermine the book's claim to biblical authority.
The doctrine of God collapses divine love and divine justice without adequate theological account. Bell's central theological move — the insistence that God's love must ultimately win everyone over — depends on a particular account of divine love that is never defended and that most of the Christian tradition would contest. Bell assumes that genuine love cannot coexist with allowing people to suffer eternal consequences for their rejection of God, but he does not engage the theological tradition's arguments that genuine love requires respecting human freedom even when that freedom results in self-destruction, that divine justice is an expression of divine love rather than a compromise of it, and that the biblical portrayal of God includes both love and wrath held in tension. The trilemma in Chapter 4 — God is either not loving, not powerful, or not successful — is rhetorically effective but theologically inadequate. It ignores the distinction between God's desires and God's decrees, between his revealed will and his sovereign will, that both Calvinist and Arminian theology have carefully maintained. Bell's refusal to engage this distinction makes his argument appear naive to readers familiar with the tradition.
The book's treatment of atonement misrepresents penal substitution. Chapter 7's critique of penal substitutionary atonement presents it in its crudest form — cosmic child abuse, a vengeful Father punishing an innocent Son — without acknowledging the sophisticated theological articulations of the doctrine from Anselm to John Stott to Fleming Rutledge. Bell is right that penal substitution can be and has been presented in ways that make God appear vindictive, but he does not engage the tradition's careful arguments that substitutionary atonement is an expression of divine love (God himself bearing the cost of forgiveness) rather than a contradiction of it, that it is grounded in dozens of biblical texts that Bell does not address (Isaiah 53, Romans 3:21-26, 2 Corinthians 5:21, Galatians 3:13, 1 Peter 2:24), and that the other atonement metaphors he favors (Christus Victor, moral transformation) presuppose rather than replace substitution. The result is that Bell appears to be arguing against a position that serious theologians do not actually hold.
The lack of scholarly engagement means the book cannot serve academic purposes. For a book making claims that depart significantly from historic Christian teaching, the absence of careful interaction with the theological tradition is disqualifying. Bell does not engage the Patristic debates about apokatastasis (universal restoration), does not address the medieval scholastic arguments for eternal punishment, does not interact with the Reformers' exegesis, and does not respond to contemporary defenders of the traditional position. This means that while the book may serve a pastoral purpose for readers struggling with these questions, it cannot function as a serious theological resource. It is a conversation-starter, not a conversation-advancer.
Engagement with the Broader Scholarly Conversation
Love Wins entered a well-established conversation about the scope of salvation, the nature of hell, and the meaning of divine love — a conversation with clear contemporary representatives that Bell largely ignores. The most important scholarly articulation of evangelical universalism is Gregory MacDonald (Robin Parry), The Evangelical Universalist (2006), which makes many of the same arguments Bell makes but with far greater exegetical care and engagement with the theological tradition. The most rigorous evangelical defense of eternal conscious torment is the multi-author volume Hell Under Fire (2004), edited by Christopher Morgan and Robert Peterson, which addresses the exegetical, theological, and philosophical questions Bell raises. The annihilationist position — that the finally impenitent are destroyed rather than eternally tormented — is defended in Edward Fudge's The Fire That Consumes (1982) and John Stott's writings, and represents a third option that Bell does not seriously consider. The direct evangelical response to Love Wins came swiftly: Francis Chan and Preston Sprinkle's Erasing Hell (2011) was written explicitly to counter Bell's claims and represents the Reformed evangelical response at a popular level. Scot McKnight's review in Christianity Today represents a more sympathetic evangelical engagement, acknowledging Bell's legitimate questions while finding his answers insufficiently biblical.
The book's place in the broader culture wars should also be noted: Love Wins became a New York Times bestseller and generated coverage in mainstream media, which treated it as representative of evangelicalism's alleged evolution on these questions. This perception frustrated evangelical leaders who insisted that Bell's position was outside evangelical boundaries and that his departure from Mars Hill Bible Church confirmed that assessment. The controversy over Love Wins contributed to the broader fragmentation of American evangelicalism and the growing division between progressive and traditional evangelical constituencies.
Conclusion and Recommendation
Love Wins is a pastorally motivated, accessibly written, and exegetically inadequate engagement with Christian teaching on hell, final judgment, and the scope of salvation. Its genuine contributions — the critique of reductionistic evangelism, the emphasis on new creation, and the accessible style that creates space for questions — are outweighed by serious weaknesses: selective and rhetorically manipulative handling of Scripture, failure to engage the texts that most clearly contradict the thesis, misrepresentation of penal substitution, and near-total absence of interaction with the theological tradition. The book succeeds in articulating questions that many Christians have felt but have been afraid to voice, but it does not provide answers that are exegetically sound or theologically adequate. Readers who find the book helpful as a catalyst for questions should supplement it immediately with more rigorous treatments from across the theological spectrum, including both sympathetic explorations of universalism (Gregory MacDonald) and careful defenses of traditional positions (Hell Under Fire, Erasing Hell). As a theological resource, the book cannot be recommended without serious reservations.
Recommended for: Pastors and ministry leaders seeking to understand the questions and concerns that have led some evangelicals to question traditional teaching on hell; readers who have been wounded by harsh, fear-based presentations of the gospel and need permission to ask questions; those exploring the range of Christian positions on final judgment, provided they read it alongside more rigorous treatments.
Not recommended for: Seminary students seeking scholarly engagement with eschatology and soteriology; readers looking for careful exegesis of the relevant biblical texts; those who need a theologically reliable guide through these questions without significant supplementation; contexts where the book would be assigned without critical engagement with its weaknesses.
Overall Assessment: ☐ Highly Recommended | ☐ Recommended | ☑ Recommended with Reservations | ☐ Not Recommended
Comments
Post a Comment