Salvation by Allegiance Alone: Rethinking Faith, Works, and the Gospel of Jesus the King by Matthew W. Bates
The Open Volume
Thoughtful Reviews in Theology and Ministry
Salvation by Allegiance Alone: Rethinking Faith, Works, and the Gospel of Jesus the King
Matthew W. Bates
Bibliographic Information
Author: Bates, Matthew W. Full Title: Salvation by Allegiance Alone: Rethinking Faith, Works, and the Gospel of Jesus the King Publisher: Baker Academic Year of Publication: 2017 Pages: xvi + 234 pp. ISBN: 978-0-8010-9797-3Series: N/A
Author Background
Matthew W. Bates (PhD, University of Notre Dame) was, at the time of writing, assistant professor of theology at Quincy University, a Franciscan institution in Quincy, Illinois. He has since moved to Northern Seminary in Lombard, Illinois, where he serves as professor of New Testament. His earlier scholarly publications — The Hermeneutics of Apostolic Proclamation (2012) and The Birth of the Trinity (2015), both with Baker Academic — established him as a serious New Testament scholar with interests in early Christian exegesis and Trinitarian origins, making Salvation by Allegiance Alone his first sustained foray into soteriology proper.
Bates's ecclesial formation is unusually diverse for a Protestant scholar: he received his undergraduate training in the Reformed tradition at Whitworth University, completed seminary studies in a transdenominational Protestant context at Regent College in Vancouver, and earned his doctorate at a Roman Catholic institution. He describes himself as a committed Protestant who nonetheless prays the morning office with Catholic Franciscan colleagues. This ecumenical location is not incidental — it directly shapes the book's argument and its aspiration to bridge the Catholic-Protestant divide on justification. Readers from confessionally narrow traditions should be aware that Bates deliberately writes from above denominational lines, engaging Reformed, Catholic, and Orthodox sources with equal interest, while not beholding his conclusions to any single confessional standard. A potential blind spot accompanies this strength: Bates's critique of "faith alone" as it has been practiced in Protestant evangelicalism sometimes reads as a caricature of its most sophisticated defenders — a tension that sharper theological critics have pressed with some justification.
Thesis and Central Argument
Bates's governing thesis is deceptively simple: the Greek word pistis, traditionally translated "faith" or "belief" in salvation-oriented contexts, is better rendered "allegiance" — and this single linguistic adjustment, properly elaborated, has the potential to reorient the church's understanding of the gospel, the nature of saving response, and the relationship between Catholic and Protestant accounts of justification. The book responds to a dual problem. First, popular evangelical Christianity has truncated the gospel to a "me-centered" forgiveness transaction, losing the kingship of Jesus as the narrative's climax. Second, the word "faith" carries anti-evidential and purely mentalist connotations in contemporary English that systematically drain away the embodied, loyalty-oriented dimensions of pistis that the New Testament authors intended. Bates's proposed contribution is terminological, exegetical, and pastoral at once: by recovering "allegiance" as the most accurate macro-term for what God requires for salvation, he aims to heal the faith-versus-works impasse, restore Jesus's enthronement to its proper place at the gospel's center, and articulate a vision of salvation as resurrection into new creation rather than the individual soul's ascent to heaven.
Overview of Contents
The book unfolds in three loosely organized movements: chapters 1–4 reconstruct the gospel and reframe pistis; chapters 5–7 address objections and expand the eschatological horizon of salvation; and chapters 8–9 address justification and practical application.
Chapters 1–4 — Deconstructing "Faith" and Reconstructing the Gospel
Bates opens with a ground-clearing chapter enumerating what faith is not — not fideism, not a leap in the dark, not the simple opposite of works, not reducible to intellectual assent. This clearing exercise is pedagogically effective and accessible to a wide audience. Chapter 2 then turns constructive, arguing from Paul's key gospel summaries (Romans 1:1–5; 1:16–17; 1 Corinthians 15:1–5; Philippians 2:6–11) that the gospel is not in the first instance a story about human need for forgiveness but an eight-stage narrative about Jesus's career — preexistence, incarnation, atoning death, burial, resurrection, appearances, enthronement as Lord, and anticipated return as judge. The climax of this gospel, Bates insists, is the enthronement of Jesus as cosmic king — an element consistently underemphasized in popular evangelical gospel presentations that reduce the good news to "Jesus died for your sins."
Chapter 3 demonstrates that Jesus himself and the four Evangelists proclaim this same eight-part gospel, weaving together the kingdom-of-God proclamations in the Synoptics with John's high Christology and the trial-before-the-Sanhedrin scene in Mark 14. Chapter 4 then delivers the book's central argument: that pistis, when directed toward Jesus as the enthroned king, is most accurately described as "allegiance" — a three-dimensional reality comprising mental affirmation that the gospel is true, confessed fealty to Jesus as cosmic Lord, and embodied loyalty through Spirit-empowered obedience. Bates draws on ancient texts (3 Maccabees, Josephus, additions to Esther) and a range of contemporary scholars — Richard Hays on the "faithfulness of Christ," N.T. Wright on pistis as "personal allegiance," John Barclay on gift and reciprocity in antiquity — to establish that the allegiance dimension of pistis is historically grounded rather than merely imported.
Chapters 5–7 — Objections, Eschatology, and Image Theology
Chapter 5 addresses the most pressing objections in Q&A format: does allegiance undermine grace? does it conflict with Paul's polemic against works? how much allegiance suffices? Bates's key move here is to distinguish "works of law" (a rule-performance system seeking to establish righteousness apart from Christ) from embodied loyalty (works performed as the enacted form of pistis itself), arguing that Paul's anti-works polemic targets the former while actually requiring the latter. His brief but important engagement with John Barclay's Paul and the Gift (2015) — demonstrating that grace in antiquity was never a "pure gift" requiring zero reciprocity — helpfully grounds this argument.
Chapters 6 and 7 shift terrain considerably, moving from salvific linguistics to eschatology and theological anthropology. Chapter 6 argues that the biblical vision of final salvation is not the soul's ascent to heaven but embodied resurrection into a radically renewed cosmos — the new Jerusalem descending, divine-human fellowship restored, culture refined rather than destroyed. Chapter 7 develops a theology of the imago Dei as "idol of God," drawing on ancient Near Eastern idol-induction practices and concluding that humans were made to dynamically embody God's presence to creation. Idolatry, on this reading, is not just false worship but a defacement of this image-bearing vocation, and final salvation is conformity to Jesus as the original and complete image of God.
Chapters 8–9 — Justification and Practice
Chapter 8 is the book's most theologically dense, engaging Catholic-Protestant debates over justification with the proposal that "incorporated righteousness" better captures the biblical witness than either Protestant "imputed" or Catholic "infused" righteousness. Bates argues that Jesus alone has been directly justified (his resurrection is the verdict), and that believers share in that verdict by union with him — a union forged by pistis and sustained by perseverance. He endorses the 1999 "Joint Declaration on Justification" between Catholics and Lutherans as a promising step and calls for subsequent ecumenical work to strengthen it. Chapter 9 concludes with pastoral application: a better gospel invitation, a critique of "bar-code faith," and a proposal to use the Apostles' Creed as a weekly pledge of allegiance to Jesus as king.
Theological Evaluation and Critique
Exegetical and Hermeneutical Method
Bates's exegetical work is careful within its stated scope. His analysis of the key Pauline gospel summaries (Romans 1:1–5; 1 Corinthians 15:3–5; Philippians 2:6–11) is thorough and properly attentive to the V-pattern of descent and exaltation that runs through Paul's christological hymns. His reading of the trial narrative in Mark 14 — showing how Jesus's citation of Psalms 110 and Daniel 7 projects his own forthcoming enthronement even as he is condemned — is exegetically compelling and theologically illuminating. His engagement with the pistis word group in Hellenistic Jewish literature (3 Maccabees, Josephus, the Greek additions to Esther) is sufficient to establish that allegiance is a legitimate semantic domain for pistis, not an anachronistic importation.
The most significant hermeneutical tension in the book is one that Will Timmins, in a detailed peer-reviewed assessment published in the Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society (61.3, 2018), pressed with considerable force: Bates moves from demonstrating that pistis can mean allegiance in certain ancient contexts to claiming that allegiance is the best macro-term for what pistis requires in salvation-oriented Pauline contexts — a claim that requires more precision than the book consistently supplies. The genitive constructions in Paul (the "obedience of pistis" in Romans 1:5; the pistis Christou debate) are argued with confidence, but the lexical demonstration sometimes outpaces the exegetical conclusion. Timmins is right that the criteria for when pistis foregrounds allegiance versus trust versus faithfulness are not always specified, leaving the argument vulnerable to the charge of semantic overclaim.
Doctrinal Analysis
Measured against the ecumenical creeds and tradition-specific confessional standards, Bates's book raises few concerns at the level of Nicene or Chalcedonian orthodoxy. His affirmation of Jesus's preexistence, incarnation, substitutionary atonement, bodily resurrection, and return in judgment is explicit and consistent throughout. The doctrinal friction emerges at the confessional and soteriological level, and it falls out differently across traditions.
From a Reformed perspective, the most significant benchmark is the Westminster Confession of Faith's robust account of sola fide alongside the Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy's hermeneutical commitments. Bates openly challenges what he calls "salvation culture" — a category that encompasses much of post-Reformation Protestant evangelicalism — and his rejection of "imputed righteousness" in the traditional covering-over sense will be felt most acutely in Reformed circles. Thomas Schreiner's review for The Gospel Coalition rightly notes that while Bates's emphasis on Jesus's enthronement as the gospel's climax is salutary, his claim that final judgment is "at least in part" on the basis of works requires more careful coordination with Pauline forensic categories than the book provides. The Heidelblog tradition's charge that Bates caricatures sola fide also has some merit: Bates consistently describes the Reformed position in its most pedestrian popular form rather than engaging its most sophisticated academic defenders. Westminster divines would find much of Bates's positive agenda compatible with their own concerns — Calvin spoke of union with Christ as the ground of justification — but would resist the terminological shift that treats "allegiance" as the governing category.
From a Wesleyan-Arminian perspective, the book's reception is notably warmer. The Wesleyan Quadrilateral's openness to reason and tradition alongside Scripture, combined with the tradition's emphasis on human cooperation with grace and the moral necessity of perseverance, makes Bates's argument congenial. His rejection of eternal security and his insistence that ongoing allegiance is required for final salvation align closely with Wesleyan soteriology, as does his critique of cheap grace. Methodist readers shaped by John Wesley's standard sermons and Notes on the New Testament will find Bates's three-dimensional account of allegiance (mental, confessional, embodied) consistent with Wesley's own synthesis of faith and works in the life of the believer.
From a Roman Catholic perspective, Bates's argument is perhaps most surprising in its proximity to Catholic concerns. His endorsement of the 1999 Joint Declaration, his preference for "incorporated" over "imputed" righteousness, his insistence that justification is not a one-time transaction but an ongoing reality, and his affirmation that good works are integral to final salvation all resonate with the Catechism of the Catholic Church (1992) and the Council of Trent's decree on justification — though Bates rightly criticizes Trent's account of a gradually increasing infused righteousness as insufficiently rooted in union with Christ. For Catholic readers, Bates's book reads as a Protestant scholar who has absorbed more of the Catholic tradition than he may fully realize.
From a Baptist and Free Church perspective, Bates's challenge to eternal security and his emphasis on embodied allegiance over confessional assent will generate the most resistance. The Baptist Faith and Message (2000) and its emphasis on perseverance will lead many Baptist readers to see Bates as veering toward an Arminian account of conditional salvation — which, in fairness, is largely accurate.
Engagement with Secondary Literature
The book's interaction with the New Perspective on Paul is competent but selective. Bates draws heavily on N.T. Wright (cited eight times), Michael Gorman, Scot McKnight, and John Barclay's Paul and the Gift (2015), all of whom are broadly sympathetic interlocutors. His engagement with his sharpest critics — James Dunn's defense of pistis as faith rather than faithfulness in the pistis Christou debate; Simon Gathercole's work on divine initiative in Paul; D.A. Carson's critiques of the New Perspective — is thinner than the book's ambitions require. The primary literature base is solid (BDAG, key Pauline epistles, Josephus, the Maccabean literature), but the history of interpretation is almost entirely absent: Augustine's rich account of fides in his anti-Pelagian writings, Luther's actual nuanced position on faith and works, and the exegetical tradition between Trent and the Reformation are mentioned but not seriously engaged. This is a real gap in a book that explicitly aims to heal the Catholic-Protestant wound.
Strengths
The recovery of Jesus's enthronement as gospel. Bates's most important contribution is the sustained, exegetically grounded argument that the enthronement of Jesus as cosmic Lord is not an appendix to the gospel but its climax. Popular evangelicalism has centered the gospel on the cross (rightly) while treating the resurrection and ascension as happy postscripts. Bates demonstrates from Paul's earliest gospel summaries, from the Synoptic proclamation of the kingdom, and from the Johannine portrait of the "lifted-up" Son that enthronement is constitutive of the good news — not optional or peripheral. This argument carries direct pastoral weight: if the gospel climaxes in a claim about who currently rules the cosmos, then the appropriate response is not merely gratitude for forgiveness but allegiance to a reigning king.
The three-dimensional account of saving allegiance. Bates's analysis of pistis as encompassing mental affirmation, confessed fealty, and embodied loyalty is one of the book's most useful structural contributions. It dissolves the false dichotomy between "faith" and "works" by showing that pistis, properly understood, already contains both: genuine allegiance cannot be disembodied any more than a soldier can pledge loyalty without showing up to fight. This framework gives pastors and teachers a vocabulary for speaking about discipleship as constitutive of salvation rather than supplementary to it — a vocabulary that is both linguistically defensible and theologically serviceable.
The image-of-God theology in chapter 7. Bates's development of the imago Dei as "idol of God" — drawing on ancient Near Eastern idol-induction practices to illuminate the purpose of human image-bearing — is genuinely illuminating and represents some of the book's most original constructive theology. The argument that humans were placed in creation as spirit-animated nexuses of divine presence, that idolatry defaces this vocation by conforming the worshiper to lifeless images, and that salvation is ultimate conformity to Jesus as the full and original image of God is both exegetically grounded and theologically generative. It gives the allegiance argument a cosmic and eschatological grounding that elevates it beyond a mere terminological proposal.
Weaknesses and Limitations
The caricature of sola fide. Bates's critique of "faith alone" frequently targets popular-level evangelical formulations — "just believe Jesus died for your sins," the Romans Road, the tract promising "one hundred percent sure" salvation — rather than the most sophisticated Protestant accounts. Luther himself insisted that genuine faith always produces love and obedience; Calvin rooted justification in union with Christ; Westminster divines understood saving faith as fiducia, not mere assent. Bates acknowledges this in passing but does not engage it adequately. The result is that readers from carefully formed confessional traditions may find themselves agreeing with much of what Bates says while feeling that their own position was never seriously represented. A more precise engagement with the Lutheran threefold definition (notitia, assensus, fiducia) and its actual capaciousness would have strengthened both the critique and the proposal.
The under-specified criteria for allegiance. The book's most practically urgent weakness is its inability to specify, concretely and pastorally, what level of allegiance suffices for salvation. Bates argues that allegiance cannot be quantified — and that desire for a precise threshold reveals a "works righteousness" mentality — but this move leaves a significant pastoral vacuum. When he writes that "perfect allegiance is neither demanded for salvation in this earthly life nor is it possible," readers understandably press the obvious follow-up: how imperfect can maintained allegiance be before it is no longer genuine? Bates points to 1 John's tests of genuine pistis as guidelines, but these remain impressionistic. The book would be considerably more useful to pastors if Bates had engaged more carefully with Reformed accounts of perseverance and Arminian accounts of apostasy — both of which have developed sophisticated frameworks for exactly this question that Bates largely bypasses.
Engagement with the Broader Scholarly Conversation
Salvation by Allegiance Alone enters a field whose contours have been shaped in recent decades by the New Perspective on Paul (Sanders, Dunn, Wright), the pistis Christou debate (Hays vs. Dunn), and the recent wave of scholarship on Paul's imperial context (Horsley, Elliott). Bates situates himself consciously in this stream, building on Wright's The King Jesus Gospel (2011), McKnight's work on the gospel proclamation, and Gorman's "cruciformity" project. His "incorporated righteousness" proposal represents a genuine attempt to synthesize the forensic and participationist strands of Pauline soteriology that Albert Schweitzer first distinguished — though without engaging Schweitzer or Douglas Campbell's more radical participationist alternatives at any length. Compared to Michael Bird's Evangelical Theology (2013), which attempts a similar cross-traditional synthesis, Bates is more linguistically focused but less systemically comprehensive. Readers seeking to situate the book in the ongoing justification debate should also consult Barclay's Paul and the Gift (2015), which Bates engages, and the 2016 Four Views on the Role of Works at the Final Judgment (ed. Alan Stanley), which addresses Bates's central concern from multiple confessional angles that Bates does not adequately represent.
Conclusion and Recommendation
Salvation by Allegiance Alone is a genuinely significant book: accessible, theologically serious, exegetically competent, and driven by genuine pastoral concern for the church's health. Bates's recovery of Jesus's enthronement as the gospel's climax, his three-dimensional account of pistis as allegiance, and his image-of-God theology represent real contributions to both the academy and the church. Its weaknesses — the caricature of sola fide in its strongest forms, the under-specified account of what allegiance requires in practice, and the thin engagement with the history of interpretation — are real but do not undermine the book's core contribution. Reformed readers will find it a serious challenge worth engaging critically; Wesleyan and Catholic readers will find it deeply congenial; Baptist readers will need to wrestle carefully with its implications for assurance and perseverance. All will benefit from reading it alongside Thomas Schreiner's Gospel Coalition review and Will Timmins's exacting critique in JETS (61.3, 2018).
Recommended for: Seminary students in New Testament, soteriology, and systematic theology courses; pastors navigating the faith-versus-works conversation in their congregations; ecumenically minded theologians interested in Catholic-Protestant dialogue; anyone dissatisfied with popular-level gospel presentations but uncertain how to articulate a more robust alternative.
Not recommended for: Readers seeking an introductory treatment of soteriology without prior grounding in Pauline studies; those requiring sustained engagement with the history of interpretation from Augustine through the Reformation; readers for whom the perseverance of the saints is a settled confessional commitment who are not prepared for a serious challenge to that doctrine.
Overall Assessment: ☐ Highly Recommended | ☑ Recommended | ☐ Recommended with Reservations | ☐ Not Recommended
Comments
Post a Comment