The New Testament and the People of God by N.T. Wright
The Open Volume
Thoughtful Reviews in Theology and Ministry
The New Testament and the People of God
N.T. Wright
Bibliographic Information
Author: Wright, N.T. Full Title: The New Testament and the People of God Publisher: Fortress Press (USA) / SPCK (UK) Year of Publication: 1992 Pages: 535 pp. (+ bibliography and indices) ISBN: 978-0-8006-2681-6 Series: Christian Origins and the Question of God, Vol. 1
Author Background
N.T. Wright (D.Phil., Oxford University) is Research Professor of New Testament and Early Christianity at St. Andrews University and one of the most prolific, widely read, and consequential New Testament scholars of the past half-century. At the time of this volume's publication he was Dean of Lichfield Cathedral, and the book reflects the unusual combination of rigorous academic scholarship and pastoral-ecclesial engagement that has characterized his entire career. His prior works — including The Climax of the Covenant (1991) and numerous essays collected in subsequent volumes — had already established his position within the New Perspective on Paul debate and his commitment to a thoroughgoing historical approach to Christian origins, but The New Testament and the People of God is the volume in which Wright's full scholarly program is announced, its methodological foundations laid, and its scope declared. Everything in the subsequent three volumes — the historical Jesus, the resurrection, and Paul — presupposes the framework established here.
Using the Theological Traditions Reference Guide's categories, Wright is most accurately placed within the Anglican tradition, specifically its broadly evangelical wing as shaped by his formation at Oxford and his engagement with figures including George Caird, whose influence on Wright's apocalyptic hermeneutic is acknowledged throughout this volume and the series. Wright's Anglicanism is not incidental to his scholarship — the tradition's commitment to the via media, its integration of Scripture, tradition, and reason, and its liturgical and ecclesial grounding all shape the way he constructs his historical-theological arguments and the conclusions he draws from them. At the same time, Wright's work has been received with remarkable breadth across the traditions: Reformed scholars have engaged him as a serious conversation partner (and sometimes as a significant threat), Catholic theologians have found his sacramental instincts and his account of Israel's story congenial, and Wesleyan and Pentecostal readers have responded to his emphasis on the Spirit's renewal of creation and the community of the new covenant.
Two contextual factors bear directly on the significance of this volume. First, The New Testament and the People of God is not primarily an exegetical commentary or a focused monograph on a specific Pauline question — it is a methodological and historiographical manifesto, announcing a program for the entire discipline of New Testament studies and arguing for a specific way of doing historical theology that Wright will execute across the subsequent three volumes. Readers who approach it expecting focused exegesis of specific texts will be frustrated; readers who approach it as the methodological foundation of a massive scholarly project will find it indispensable. Second, the book's engagement with the question of how historical scholarship and Christian theology relate to each other — how the historian can simultaneously practice rigorous critical method and make theological claims — is the most sustained and most philosophically serious treatment of this question in contemporary New Testament studies, and it defines the intellectual terms within which the entire series operates.
Thesis and Central Argument
The governing thesis of The New Testament and the People of God is threefold and operates at three levels of increasing specificity. At the methodological level, Wright argues for a critical realist epistemology as the appropriate framework for both historical and theological inquiry — a position that rejects both the naive positivism that assumes historical facts are simply "out there" to be discovered and the radical relativism that treats all historical reconstructions as equally arbitrary constructions. At the historical level, he argues that the New Testament can only be understood within the context of first-century Judaism — specifically, within the narrative world of Second Temple Jewish hopes, symbols, and practices — and that the methods of critical historiography, properly applied, can yield genuine knowledge of that context and of the figures and texts that inhabited it. At the theological level, he argues that the earliest Christians understood themselves as the people in whom Israel's story had reached its climax — the community in whom the divine promises to Abraham, Moses, and the prophets were being fulfilled — and that this story-shaped identity is the key to understanding everything from the structure of the New Testament documents to the specific theological claims of Paul, the Synoptics, and John.
The book responds to an impasse in New Testament scholarship that had been building since the Enlightenment: the apparent irreconcilability of rigorous historical-critical scholarship with confessional Christian faith, and the resulting tendency of scholarship to bifurcate between a "historical Jesus" bearing no theological weight and a "Christ of faith" bearing no historical accountability. Wright's proposed contribution is to argue that this bifurcation is generated not by the evidence but by the methodological assumptions — positivist, reductionist, or idealist — that have governed the discipline since the nineteenth century, and that a critical realist approach to the historical evidence can yield both genuine historical knowledge and genuine theological insight without sacrificing the integrity of either.
Overview of Contents
The New Testament and the People of God is organized across five major parts: the methodological framework (Part One), the literary context of the New Testament (Part Two), the historical context of first-century Judaism (Part Three), the story of the earliest Christians (Part Four), and a concluding account of the theology of the New Testament documents (Part Five).
Part One: The Methodological Framework — Critical Realism and the Study of the New Testament
The book's opening section is its most philosophically demanding and its most important for understanding everything that follows. Wright develops his critical realist epistemology in dialogue with the philosophy of science — drawing on Imre Lakatos's account of research programs and Michael Polanyi's account of personal knowledge — and applies it to the specific challenges of historical and theological inquiry. The critical realist position holds that the world is real and knowable, that our knowledge of it is always mediated through the interpretive frameworks we bring to the evidence, and that the goal of inquiry is not the elimination of those frameworks but their critical refinement in response to the evidence. This is neither the naive positivism that assumes the facts speak for themselves nor the postmodern relativism that treats all interpretive frameworks as equally valid, and Wright's articulation of the middle position is among the most philosophically precise in New Testament scholarship.
The application of critical realism to the study of the New Testament produces Wright's account of the "five gospels" — Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, and the Gospel of Thomas — as a heuristic device for introducing the question of the historical Jesus, and his account of the "stories," "symbols," "praxis," and "questions" that constitute a worldview as the analytical framework for reconstructing the first-century Jewish and Christian contexts. The worldview analysis is the methodological centerpiece of the series: Wright argues that understanding a text or a community requires understanding the story it inhabits, the symbols through which it enacts that story, the practices by which it embodies it, and the fundamental questions — about God, humanity, evil, and hope — to which its worldview offers answers. This framework governs the historical reconstructions of all subsequent volumes.
Part Two: The Literary Context — Reading the New Testament Documents
The second section develops Wright's account of how the New Testament documents should be read as literary and historical artifacts. His treatment of narrative — drawing on the literary theory of narrative developed by Gerard Genette and Paul Ricoeur — establishes the category of "story" as the primary framework for understanding both the worldview of first-century Judaism and the theological claims of the New Testament authors. The argument that the New Testament authors understand themselves as living within a story — the story of Israel, creation, and the covenant God — and that their specific theological claims are best understood as moves within that story rather than as abstract doctrinal propositions is the literary-theoretical foundation of the entire series.
The treatment of the relationship between the canonical Gospels and the extra-canonical sources — including the Gospel of Thomas and the other Nag Hammadi documents — is careful and balanced, and Wright's argument that the canonical Gospels, despite their theological shaping, preserve genuine historical memory of Jesus is developed with appropriate nuance. The account of Pauline authorship and the dating of the New Testament documents reflects the standard critical positions of the period, and readers from traditions with strong commitments to traditional authorship will want to engage these sections critically rather than receiving them as settled.
Part Three: The Historical Context — First-Century Judaism
The book's central and most substantial section surveys the diversity of first-century Judaism — the Pharisees, Sadducees, Essenes, revolutionaries, and the diaspora communities — through the lens of the worldview analysis established in Part One. Wright's account of the Jewish worldview is organized around the narrative of exile and return: the claim that first-century Jews understood themselves as still living in a state of effective exile — the promises of Deuteronomy 30 and the prophets had not yet been fulfilled, the Temple had been defiled, the land was occupied by pagans, and the divine presence had not yet returned — and that their diverse religious and political programs were all, in different ways, responses to this condition of ongoing exile and expressions of hope for its resolution.
This "return from exile" motif is the most consequential and most contested historical claim in the entire series. Wright develops it with considerable historical detail, drawing on the relevant primary sources — the Dead Sea Scrolls, the Pseudepigrapha, Josephus, and the Rabbinic literature — and it functions as the key that unlocks his historical Jesus proposals in Volume 2 and his Pauline theology proposals in Volume 4. The claim is not that all first-century Jews explicitly used the language of exile but that the narrative structure of Israel's story — as understood within the dominant streams of Second Temple Judaism — was organized around the hope for a decisive divine act of restoration that had not yet occurred and for whose arrival the community was waiting, preparing, or fighting. Critics including Maurice Casey (Jesus of Nazareth, 2010) and James Crossley (The Date of Mark's Gospel, 2004) have challenged the historical adequacy of this reconstruction from a secular-critical direction; N.A. Dahl and others within the theological guild have pressed the question of whether the "return from exile" motif is as central to first-century Judaism as Wright claims. These objections are addressed in the evaluation section below.
Part Four: The Story of the Earliest Christians
The fourth section develops Wright's account of how the earliest Christians understood themselves and their movement within the framework of the Jewish worldview established in Part Three. The argument is that the earliest Christians did not understand themselves as members of a new religion — a departure from Judaism — but as the people in whom Israel's story had reached its climax. Jesus was the Messiah in whom the divine promises had been fulfilled, the Temple had been replaced by his body and the community that embodied it, the Torah had been fulfilled and reinterpreted by his teaching and his death, and the long-awaited divine return to Zion had occurred in and through his resurrection. The Christian community's self-understanding as the renewed people of God — the community of the new covenant — is developed through the analysis of the symbols, practices, and stories that characterized the earliest Christian communities, and this account provides the historical foundation for the specifically Pauline theology developed in Volume 4.
Part Five: The Theology of the New Testament
The book's final section addresses the question of New Testament theology directly — the question of how the diverse documents of the New Testament relate to each other theologically and what kind of theological claims the historian-theologian can make on their basis. Wright's account of New Testament theology as the theology of the story — the narrative of creation, Israel, Jesus, and the new covenant community — rather than as a system of propositions or a collection of existential insights is the theological conclusion toward which the entire methodological and historical apparatus of the book has been building, and it provides the framework within which the specific theological claims of the subsequent volumes are located.
Theological Evaluation and Critique
Exegetical and Hermeneutical Method
The hermeneutical method of The New Testament and the People of God is the most philosophically developed in the series and the most consequential for assessing everything Wright does in the subsequent volumes. The critical realist epistemology is articulated with genuine philosophical care, and its application to the challenges of historical and theological inquiry is more sophisticated than most New Testament scholars have attempted. The worldview analysis — story, symbol, praxis, and questions — is a productive and flexible analytical tool that illuminates both the Jewish context and the Christian response with genuine clarity.
The most significant methodological tension — pressed with precision by Francis Watson in Text and Truth (1997) and by Stephen Neill and Tom Wright himself in The Interpretation of the New Testament 1861–1986 (1988) — concerns the relationship between the historian's reconstruction and the theologian's confession. Wright's critical realism holds that genuine historical knowledge is possible and that theological claims can be grounded in it, but the question of how the historian's Jesus — whose identity is established by the evidence and the method — relates to the Christ confessed in the creeds is one that the methodological framework poses more clearly than it resolves. The Chalcedonian Definition's affirmation that Jesus Christ is fully divine and fully human is not a conclusion that historical method can establish or refute on its own terms, and the relationship between Wright's historical project and the church's creedal confession requires more explicit philosophical articulation than the critical realist framework alone provides.
Doctrinal Analysis
The doctrinal stakes of The New Testament and the People of God are primarily methodological and historiographical rather than specific — the book establishes the framework within which doctrinal questions are subsequently addressed rather than arguing directly for specific doctrinal positions. The analysis must therefore address the framework across the traditions.
From a Reformed perspective, the most significant question concerns the relationship between Wright's narrative-historical approach and the Reformed tradition's account of Scripture's authority and sufficiency. The Westminster Confession of Faith (1646), Chapter I, affirms that "the whole counsel of God concerning all things necessary for His own glory, man's salvation, faith and life, is either expressly set down in Scripture, or by good and necessary consequence may be deduced from Scripture." Wright's insistence that the New Testament documents can only be understood within the historical context of first-century Judaism — a context that requires substantial extracanonical historical reconstruction to access — raises the question of whether the Confession's account of Scripture's sufficiency is compatible with a hermeneutic that makes extracanonical historical knowledge a condition of accurate biblical interpretation. This is the same tension noted in the review of Walton's Ancient Near Eastern Thought and the Old Testament, and it applies with comparable force here. Richard Gaffin's engagement with Wright in By Faith, Not by Sight (2006) and D.A. Carson's extended critical engagement in Justification and Variegated Nomism represent the Reformed tradition's most carefully argued responses to Wright's historical-theological program, and readers from that tradition should engage both before assessing the framework established in this volume.
From a Wesleyan-Arminian perspective, Wright's narrative-historical framework is broadly compatible with the Wesleyan tradition's commitment to the integration of Scripture, tradition, reason, and experience in theological reflection, and his emphasis on the renewal of creation and the community of the new covenant resonates with Wesley's own account of the Christian life as the restoration of the divine image in humanity and in the world. Thomas Oden's engagement with Wright's historical Jesus proposals in The Word of Life (1989) — which develops a classically orthodox account of Jesus's identity that shares Wright's commitment to historical grounding — is the most relevant Wesleyan-adjacent engagement with the methodological questions this volume raises.
From a Roman Catholic perspective, Wright's critical realist epistemology and his commitment to a historically grounded theology are broadly compatible with the Catholic tradition's engagement with the historical-critical method as authorized by Divino Afflante Spiritu (1943) and developed in Dei Verbum (1965). The narrative framework — the story of Israel, creation, and covenant as the interpretive context for the New Testament — resonates with the Catholic tradition's typological reading of the relationship between the testaments and with the Catechism of the Catholic Church's (1992) account of Scripture's unity as grounded in God's single plan of salvation. Catholic scholars including Luke Timothy Johnson (The Real Jesus, 1996) — who shares Wright's historical commitments while pressing different methodological concerns — and Brant Pitre (Jesus and the Jewish Roots of the Eucharist, 2011) — who applies a closely related historical methodology to the Eucharistic narratives — represent the most productive Catholic engagement with Wright's program.
From a Lutheran perspective, Wright's narrative-theological framework sits in the most significant tension with the Lutheran tradition's hermeneutical commitments. Luther's insistence that the law-gospel distinction provides the master key for reading all of Scripture — and his corresponding suspicion of any hermeneutic that locates the theological center of the New Testament in the fulfillment of Israel's story rather than in the word of grace addressed to the sinner — implies a different account of what the New Testament is doing than Wright's narrative framework provides. Gerhard Forde's critique of what he calls "narrative theology" in The Law-Gospel Debate (1969) anticipates several of the tensions that Wright's program creates for the Lutheran tradition, and readers from that background will want to press the question of whether the story of Israel's fulfillment is the same as the word of grace that creates faith — and whether Wright's framework adequately preserves the distinction between the two.
From a Baptist and broader evangelical perspective, the most significant concern is with the relationship between Wright's historical reconstruction of early Christian theology and the confessional evangelical account of biblical authority. The Baptist Faith and Message (2000) affirms that Scripture is the "supreme standard by which all human conduct, creeds, and religious opinions should be tried," and Wright's insistence that extracanonical historical reconstruction is a necessary condition of accurate biblical interpretation raises the question of whether the sola scriptura principle — however nuanced — is compatible with a hermeneutic that makes the historian's reconstruction of first-century Judaism an indispensable interpretive framework. This concern has been pressed most directly by Thomas Schreiner in New Testament Theology (2008) and by Brian Rosner in his engagement with Wright's Pauline proposals, and Baptist readers should engage both before accepting the methodological framework this volume establishes.
Engagement with Secondary Literature
The secondary literature engagement in The New Testament and the People of God is among the most comprehensive in the field for its date of publication, and it remains a model of scholarly breadth and precision. The philosophical literature on epistemology and the philosophy of science — Lakatos, Polanyi, Kuhn — is engaged with genuine competence rather than merely invoked as methodological decoration. The primary sources of Second Temple Judaism — the Dead Sea Scrolls, Josephus, the Pseudepigrapha, Philo — are engaged with appropriate technical care, and the standard critical editions are cited and used throughout.
The most significant gap — which Wright has acknowledged in subsequent publications — is in the feminist and postcolonial scholarship that was beginning to reshape the field at the time of publication. Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza's In Memory of Her (1983) and the broader project of ideological criticism are engaged minimally, and the question of how Wright's reconstruction of first-century Judaism and early Christianity relates to the concerns of liberation theology and postcolonial biblical criticism is not addressed. This gap is less consequential for the book's central arguments than for its claim to provide a comprehensive methodological framework for New Testament studies, and it is a limitation that careful readers should note.
Strengths
The critical realist epistemology. The book's most philosophically significant contribution is its articulation of critical realism as the appropriate epistemological framework for both historical and theological inquiry. The demonstration that the choice is not between naive positivism and radical relativism — that genuine historical knowledge is possible without the elimination of the interpreter's perspective — is the most important methodological contribution in the series and one of the most significant in contemporary New Testament scholarship. The application of critical realism to the specific challenges of historical Jesus research and early Christian historiography provides the discipline with a more philosophically honest account of what it is doing than either the positivist or the relativist alternative allows, and it remains the most influential articulation of this position in the literature.
The worldview analysis framework. The analytical framework of story, symbol, praxis, and questions — applied to both the Jewish context and the earliest Christian communities — is among the most productive tools for comparative religious and historical analysis introduced into New Testament studies in the past fifty years. Its application across the subsequent three volumes demonstrates its flexibility and its illuminating power, and it has been adopted, adapted, and contested by scholars across the full methodological spectrum in ways that reflect its genuine contribution to the analytical vocabulary of the field. Pastors and teachers who engage this framework will find it transforming the way they read both the Old Testament narratives that provide the story's background and the New Testament texts that narrate its climax.
The return from exile motif. Wright's account of first-century Judaism as organized around the narrative of ongoing exile and the hope for divine restoration is the most historically consequential proposal in the book, and it has proved the most generative for the subsequent volumes. Whatever the ongoing debates about its historical adequacy, the motif provides a framework for understanding the urgency of first-century Jewish religious and political life — including the ministry of Jesus and the theology of Paul — that illuminates both with a historical vividness that purely literary or theological approaches cannot match. The demonstration that the Jewish hope was not for individual afterlife or purely spiritual blessing but for the restoration of Israel, the renewal of creation, and the return of the divine presence to Zion is a genuine historical contribution that has enriched the reading of the New Testament across the traditions.
The scope and ambition of the project. The sheer scope and ambition of the Christian Origins and the Question of God series — announced and grounded in this volume — is itself a significant contribution to the discipline. Wright's willingness to engage simultaneously the full range of methodological, historical, literary, and theological questions bearing on the study of the New Testament — without retreating to the specialization that has fragmented the field into mutually inaccessible subdisciplines — models an integrative approach to biblical scholarship that is as rare as it is necessary. Whether or not every specific proposal succeeds, the ambition of the project has enlarged the horizon of what New Testament scholarship can aspire to accomplish.
Weaknesses and Limitations
The return from exile motif is overextended. The book's most consequential weakness is the degree to which the return from exile motif is pressed as the master key to first-century Jewish thought. While the motif is genuinely present in significant streams of Second Temple literature — particularly in the Dead Sea Scrolls and in texts like 4 Ezra and 2 Baruch — the claim that it constitutes the organizing narrative of first-century Judaism as a whole is historically overstated. Maurice Casey, James Crossley, and Scot McKnight (A New Vision for Israel, 1999) have all pressed the objection that Wright's reconstruction homogenizes a historically diverse movement around a single narrative theme, and the objection has sufficient evidential force to mean that the proposals of the subsequent volumes — which depend heavily on this reconstruction — should be received with appropriate critical scrutiny rather than as established historical conclusions.
The philosophical framework is more programmatic than fully executed. The critical realist epistemology announced in Part One is the most important methodological contribution of the book, but its application to the specific historical and theological questions of the subsequent parts is sometimes less rigorous than the programmatic statement promises. The relationship between the historian's reconstruction and the theologian's confession — between the Jesus of history and the Christ of faith — is posed clearly but not resolved with the philosophical precision the framework demands, and the transition from historical conclusion to theological claim is sometimes made more quickly than the critical realist method's own standards of rigor require. Readers who engage the philosophical literature on which Wright draws — particularly Lakatos and Polanyi — will notice points at which the application of the framework to the specific challenges of New Testament theology is less fully worked out than the initial statement suggests.
The treatment of the canonical documents is occasionally subordinated to the historical reconstruction. A recurring tension in the book — most visible in the treatment of the Pauline letters and the Synoptic Gospels — is the tendency to subordinate the canonical documents' own theological logic to the historical reconstruction within which Wright locates them. The narrative of Israel's story and the return from exile provides a powerful contextual framework, but it occasionally functions as a Procrustean bed into which the diverse theological voices of the New Testament are fitted rather than as a genuinely illuminating context that allows each voice to be heard on its own terms. This is a tension that runs through the entire series and that becomes most visible in the Pauline volume, but its roots are in the methodological decisions made here.
Engagement with the Broader Scholarly Conversation
The New Testament and the People of God enters a field that had been shaped, for the preceding two decades, by the New Perspective on Paul (Sanders, Dunn) and by the Third Quest for the Historical Jesus (Meier, Crossan, Borg). Wright's relationship to both movements is complex: he shares the New Perspective's commitment to taking first-century Judaism seriously on its own terms while resisting Sanders's specific account of covenantal nomism; he shares the Third Quest's commitment to historical rigor while resisting the tendency of figures like Crossan and Borg to produce a Jesus whose contours reflect contemporary liberal concerns more than first-century evidence. The most important scholarly responses to Wright's methodological program are Francis Watson's Text and Truth (1997) — which presses the relationship between historical reconstruction and theological interpretation from a Barthian direction — and the essays collected in Jesus and the Restoration of Israel (Newman, ed., 1999), which represent the first sustained scholarly engagement with Wright's historical Jesus proposals. Within the systematic theological tradition, Markus Bockmuehl's Seeing the Word (2006) and Richard Bauckham's Jesus and the Eyewitnesses (2006) represent the most productive engagements with the methodological questions Wright raises from adjacent but distinct perspectives.
Conclusion and Recommendation
The New Testament and the People of God is the most methodologically ambitious work in the Christian Origins and the Question of God series and the essential foundation for evaluating everything Wright does in the subsequent three volumes. Its genuine contributions — the critical realist epistemology, the worldview analysis framework, the return from exile motif, and the sheer scope of the scholarly program it announces — are landmarks in New Testament scholarship that have permanently shaped the terms within which the historical and theological study of Christian origins is conducted. Its limitations — the overextension of the return from exile motif, the gap between the programmatic statement of critical realism and its full execution, and the occasional subordination of canonical logic to historical reconstruction — are real and consequential, and they define the points at which the series' subsequent volumes must be engaged with critical scrutiny rather than received as settled historical conclusions. For any reader who wants to engage Wright's Pauline theology, his historical Jesus proposals, or his account of the resurrection with the seriousness they deserve, this volume is not optional — it is the indispensable starting point.
Recommended for: Ph.D. students and faculty in New Testament, historical Jesus studies, and systematic theology; M.Div. and Th.M. students in advanced New Testament theology and hermeneutics courses; pastors with sufficient historical and philosophical background to engage the methodological arguments; any serious reader who has engaged Wright's popular-level works — Simply Christian, Surprised by Hope, The Day the Revolution Began — and wants to understand the scholarly foundations on which those works rest; scholars from any discipline who want to engage the most ambitious attempt at an integrated historical-theological account of Christian origins in contemporary scholarship.
Not recommended for: Readers without background in New Testament studies or Second Temple Judaism who are looking for an introductory treatment — the book presupposes significant familiarity with the primary sources and scholarly debates that a first-time reader of New Testament scholarship will lack; those seeking focused exegesis of specific New Testament texts — this volume provides the methodological and historical framework rather than the exegetical application, and readers wanting the latter should begin with Volume 2; readers from confessional Reformed or Lutheran traditions who require direct engagement with their tradition's most sophisticated responses to Wright's program — D.A. Carson, Richard Gaffin, and Gerhard Forde — before assessing the methodological framework; those looking for a complete New Testament theology rather than the foundation of a multi-volume historical-theological project.
Overall Assessment: ☐ Highly Recommended | ☑ Recommended | ☐ Recommended with Reservations | ☐ Not Recommended
Comments
Post a Comment